Protect

RED FLEET

Uintah County
Fathom Restoration
40° 34′ 38″ N
109° 26′ 02″ WRED FLEET RESERVOIR
Donate to Protect Red Fleet
People have pried 200 million year old dinosaur tracks off the shore of this reservoir and thrown them in the water. A dive was considered in 2018 and no agency record says it happened. The one recovery anyone did make, in 2001, exists in a single newspaper story. Every figure here is quoted from its source.
10+Dinosaur tracks destroyed in six months to April 2018
90%Of the 2001 damage recovered by two volunteer divers
0Agency records of any dive after the 2018 damage
2015The year every fish in this reservoir was killed
NonePublished maximum depth, from any agency
Live from Big Brush Creek
This is one of the few reservoirs in this series with both a working daily storage series and a live inflow gauge. Nothing measures the inside of the water.
contacting federal services
Water in the reservoirNRCS
reading the daily storage record
Of capacityReclamation
against 26,000 acre feet
Inflow, Big Brush CreekUSGS
reading the gauge above the reservoir
Forecast over the waterNWS
contacting the National Weather Service
About  ·  01

A trackway on the shore and no record of who went in after it

What was thrown in the water, what was said about it, what was never published, and the dam that used to have a different name.

On 30 April 2018 Utah State Parks published a release with a plain title: stop vandalising the dinosaur tracks at Red Fleet. Visitors, it said, "have been ripping up sandstone slabs containing 200 million year old dinosaur tracks and throwing them into the water" .

The park manager at the time, Josh Hansen: "Some of the tracks are very distinct to the layperson, but just as many are not. That is why it is important to not disturb any rocks at the dinosaur trackway." And: "It is illegal to displace rocks that contain the tracks. Disturbing them like this is an act of vandalism" .

The agency's own conservative estimate was at least ten tracks destroyed in the six months before that release .

This is not a Fathom project and this page is not a call to go and get them. The tracks are on state and federal ground, the reservoir is a Reclamation dam, and moving a paleontological resource without a permit is a crime under Utah law . This page exists because the question of what is on the bottom of a Utah reservoir, and who has ever gone to look, is the question Fathom was set up around.

Every contemporary account says the same thing, and it is always in the conditional. The park was considering sending a dive team to retrieve the thrown slabs .

Utah State Parks' only publication on the incident says nothing about divers, nothing about entering the water, and nothing about recovery . No agency has published a count of slabs recovered in 2018, a date for a dive, or a statement of what became of the material. The state parks archive for that month carries one Red Fleet post and no follow up.

It happened once before, and that account is a single newspaper story. On 19 July 2001 four members of a Varsity Scout team threw slickrock containing footprints into the water. On 1 August 2001 two volunteer scuba divers from Vernal, Michael Weyland and Paul Carroll, went in after them. They searched the silty bottom at 56 feet first, then found the rocks in shallow water, and recovered about 90 percent of the damaged footprints. The damage was three prints out of an eight print trackway .

That is the whole documentary record of the 2001 recovery: one Deseret News article. Utah State Parks, the Utah Geological Survey and the Utah Department of Natural Resources have published nothing about it. A volunteer dive that got 90 percent of a vandalised trackway back off the bottom of a reservoir is not in any agency's record of itself. Where the 2001 recovery is repeated in later coverage, it is being repeated from this one story.

The Utah Geological Survey maps them: "Dinosaur tracks can be observed along the north shore of Red Fleet Reservoir in the upper part of the Nugget Sandstone" . The Nugget here is Lower Jurassic to Upper Triassic, 500 to 1,140 feet thick, and mostly wind blown dune sand .

Utah State Parks describes them as three toed and made by bipedal dinosaurs, ranging 3 to 17 inches, and "believed to be more than 200 million years old." It also records a second site, about 40 smaller tracks of four to five inches in the Carmel Formation, where "the species has not yet been identified" .

What is missingWhere it was looked for
Any ichnogenus name, the formal name for a kind of track. No Grallator, no Eubrontes, no AnchisauripusUtah Geological Survey publications and its geologic map of this quadrangle, Utah State Parks, the Bureau of Land Management
Any peer reviewed description of the tracksite at allThe published ichnological literature. The site has been interpreted to the public since 1988
A total count of tracks at the main site, and a count of what has been lostEvery agency above. The only loss figure anywhere is "at least 10" in six months
Any condition monitoring, photogrammetry or map of the trackwayEvery agency above
The Dilophosaurus attribution is not agency material and it does not hold up. It appears in news coverage and on the state tourism site, once described as "a member of the raptor family." Dilophosaurus is a genus known from bones, not a name for a footprint, and raptors are a different group from a different period. No agency source names a trackmaker for Red Fleet, and this page will not either.

The best agency document on this trackway is a Utah State Parks booklet published for it. Its own link returns a server error, and a mirrored copy has no readable text. If you want the detail, ask the park for a copy directly.

Utah State Parks: a 1.5 mile trail one way, three miles round trip, "somewhat strenuous because of its several uphill and downhill sections" .

The Bureau of Land Management publishes a recreation site called Dinosaur Trackway Trailhead at 40.595646, -109.436318, which plots on the north shore of this reservoir where the geologic map puts the tracks. It calls the walk about one mile round trip and easy to moderate, and dates the tracks to 180 million years .

Nothing found resolves this. Either two agencies are describing the same trackway with materially different numbers and implying different management of the ground, or there are two Nugget Sandstone tracksites about a mile apart. This page does not assert which agency the tracks are on. The Bureau of Land Management coordinate is the only published one for the trail from anybody, so it is the one on the map above.

Utah State Parks publishes no coordinates at all for this park: not for the entrance, the beach, the trailhead or the tracks. Given the vandalism history that may well be deliberate, but no agency says so.

Red Fleet Dam is a Bureau of Reclamation dam, built as the Jensen Unit of the Central Utah Project and operated since 1 May 1985 by the Uintah Water Conservancy District . Construction ran May 1977 to April 1980 and the reservoir began storing water in May 1980 .

Two things about the site are worth knowing. The dam was moved downstream from the original Tyzack site to site C-5 on geologic grounds, and the design was revised after the Teton Dam failure of June 1976 .

The name changed because of the rocks. Water district president B. H. Stringham thought the red sandstone near the dam site looked like the sails of a fleet of ships, and led the effort to rename dam and reservoir from Tyzack to Red Fleet . The fins are the Chinle Formation at the base and the Nugget Sandstone above, cut apart by differential erosion .

The old name is still in force. Utah's water quality rules classify this water under "Big Brush Creek and tributaries, from Tyzack (Red Fleet) Dam to headwaters" . Forty six years after the renaming, the legally operative name of the dam in the state administrative code is the one nobody uses.

The park opened to the public on 1 January 1988, when Utah State Parks took over the recreation facilities .

The Utah Division of State History records that Paleoindian, Archaic and Fremont peoples all lived in the Uinta Basin, that Fremont groups left rock art in Dry Fork Canyon near Vernal, and that the Uinta-ats Utes lived in the basin . That is the county scale, and it is as far as the sourced record goes.

  • No agency source and no peer reviewed work found documents a specific Fremont or Ute connection to Big Brush Creek or to this reservoir site.
  • No archaeological survey, site record or Section 106 file for the inundation area could be located. Reclamation's own history of the Jensen Unit discusses Fremont and Ute presence in the basin generally, records no consultation with any tribe before construction, and gives only a bibliographic reference to Central Utah Project cultural resource surveys with no detail on this site .
  • The valley Vernal sits in is outside the reservation boundary, and the reservation was cut down repeatedly: 7,000 acres taken for gilsonite mining in the late 1800s, and the Uintah Reservation opened to settlers six years after that .
The right sources are not this page. They are the Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation, whose own account in their own words is the only appropriate primary source; the Utah State Historic Preservation Office, which holds the site records; and the Bureau of Reclamation Provo Area Office, which would hold the Jensen Unit cultural resource compliance files from 1976 to 1980.
Science  ·  02

A reservoir that has ranged from 149 acres to 524

Four surface areas, three dam heights, no depth at all, water that arrives out of a cave, and a state agency that contradicted itself in a single day.

The shape at the top of this page was traced by hand for a print, then scaled to the extent of the USGS water body polygon and measured off its own coordinates.

ScalingTraced areaAgainst the federal polygon
One scale factor, matched on length471 acres5.4 percent small
Stretched to fill the extent on both axes516 acres3.7 percent large
One scale factor, matched on width566 acres13.8 percent large

The two shapes are 8.8 percent apart on proportion. Both are the same kind of shape: the traced outline fills 18.4 percent of its own bounding box and the federal polygon fills 18.2 percent of its, which is what a drowned canyon looks like from above.

On this reservoir the disagreement is not the drawing's fault. The federal survey records Red Fleet operating between about 149 and about 524 acres across its record . That is a factor of three and a half. A reservoir that swings that far does not have one shoreline, and any single outline of it, including this one, is a picture of one day.

Traced from OpenStreetMap geometry under the Open Database License, and that credit travels with any public use of the shape.

This is the widest spread of published figures for any water in this series. Every one of these is a federal or state agency.

MeasureFigureSource
Surface area750 acresUtah State Parks
521 acresReclamation, the national dam inventory and the 2015 treatment assessment, agreeing
498 acresThe federal water body polygon
149 to 524 acresThe operating range across the record, federal survey
Dam height175 ft structuralReclamation dam data
161 ftThe national dam inventory
144 ftReclamation's Jensen Unit page and its own written history
Capacity26,000 acre feet total, 24,000 activeReclamation
26,015 total, 22,000 activeThe 2015 treatment assessment
33,600 acre feetThe national dam inventory, whose own maximum and normal storage both read 26,000
Drainage area94.39 sq miThe national dam inventory
83 sq miReclamation
77.2 sq miAt the gauge just above the reservoir, which legitimately excludes the ground below it
Crest length1,670 ft or 1,750 ftReclamation, against the dam inventory
Normal water surface5,608.2 ft, maximum 5,621.0, crest 5,627.0, dead pool 5,506.0Reclamation
Maximum depthNot published by anyoneSee the note below
Mean depthNot published by anyoneSame
Nobody publishes a depth for this reservoir. Not Reclamation, not the dam inventory, not Utah State Parks, not the wildlife division, and not the federal survey report written specifically about this reservoir, which contains no bathymetry . The closest things to a figure are the dam's hydraulic height, which Reclamation gives as 138 feet and the dam inventory as 126 , and one measured number from a bad day: on 15 July 2020 the state dive team found a drowning victim at about 40 feet in the wakeless area . Neither is a published depth and this page does not present them as one.

Utah State Parks' 750 acres is about 44 percent above every federal figure and cannot be reconciled with a 26,000 acre foot reservoir at 521 acres. Both are printed because both are what the agencies say. There is also no published shoreline length from anyone.

The single most substantial piece of science about this reservoir is a federal survey report from 2019, and its finding is that the inflow is karst .

"Big Brush Creek is predominantly supplied by Brush Creek Spring," about four miles above the Highway 191 bridge, and that spring is "the primary discharge point for karst features that are developed in Paleozoic carbonate lithologies" . The gauge upstream of the spring carries the fact in its own name: Big Brush Creek above cave, near Vernal.

AquiferDissolved solidsWhere its water comes from
Nugget SandstoneUnder 200 mg/L, good qualityHigh altitude sources unrelated to the reservoir
Frontier SandstoneAbout 2,150 mg/L, poor qualityLow elevation, at temperatures like the reservoir's own

Total groundwater discharge to the reservoir from 1980 to 2015 was calculated at roughly 40,000 acre feet, which is more than one and a half times the reservoir's own capacity .

This matters on the ice. The state's ice guidance warns specifically about "stream mouths and underwater springs" . This reservoir's principal inflow is a spring fed creek running out of a karst system, which makes that the standard caution at the Big Brush arm rather than a generic one.

The rock around the reservoir dips 20 to 30 degrees south. From north to south the section runs Nugget Sandstone, Carmel, Entrada, Curtis and Morrison, then Dakota, Mowry, Frontier and Mancos .

What works. There is a live inflow gauge, which most reservoirs in this series do not have: USGS 09261700, Big Brush Creek above the reservoir, daily since 1 October 1979, run with the Utah Division of Water Rights . And the storage station 09UTREDF:UT:BOR publishes a working daily series, which is not something to take for granted after four reservoirs in this series whose daily series returned nothing .

What is gone. The old gauge, USGS 09262000, ran daily from 16 March 1939 and carried water samples back to 27 June 1908. It stopped on 9 October 1979, nine days after the new gauge upstream started, and the federal survey records that the site was later inundated by the reservoir .

What nobody reads live. There are twelve water quality stations in and around this reservoir, three federal and nine state, including three profile stations inside the water and one that exists solely to sample fish for mercury . None of them publishes a live reading. The only dated agency water temperature this page could find is 58 degrees on 3 May 2019, from a fishing report .

Utah State Parks disagreed with itself about this reservoir on the same day. On 13 August 2026 its Discover page showed 72 degrees and 34 percent full while its main park page showed 60 degrees and 39 percent full . Same agency, same reservoir, same day. If you use a state park conditions figure, take the page and the timestamp with it.

There is no snow station in Big Brush Creek's own subwatershed. The closest in the same subbasin is Kings Cabin, 559:UT:SNTL, at 8,740 feet about ten miles north, reporting since 1978 . Hickerson Park is often listed as a nearby Vernal station and sits in a different subbasin entirely.

Red Fleet is classified 1C, 2B, 3A and 4: protected for domestic supply after treatment, for infrequent primary contact recreation, for cold water game fish, and for agriculture . Reclamation's 2015 assessment says 2A instead, which is the frequent contact class . The rule controls, and both are printed.

Reclamation's 2015 assessment also states Red Fleet was "listed as impaired for water temperature; previously cited for dissolved oxygen deficiency" . That is an eleven year old statement and this page could not verify the current status.

The state environmental department's entire website is closed to automated reading. That includes the one page that would carry this reservoir's algae monitoring results, the current integrated report, and the recreational water quality index. Federal alternatives failed too. So: no current impairment listing, no assessment unit, no cell counts, no toxin concentrations, and no advisory dates are printed on this page, because none could be obtained. The department monitored this reservoir in 2022, because the page for it exists.

Two clean findings survive. Red Fleet carries no fish consumption advisory, and it appears nowhere in the state's June 2023 advisory document , even though the state runs a mercury fish tissue station here . And on 13 August 2026 the park's live algae status field read clear .

Steinaker, six and a half miles away and run by the same water district, carries three mercury advisories: brown trout, largemouth bass and rainbow trout . Two neighbouring reservoirs, one operator, and a different answer.

Recreation  ·  03

Where everything is

Nine places, a rebuilt campground, a trail two agencies cannot agree on, and the sister reservoir six miles south.

The whole reservoir
Midpoint of the USGS National Hydrography Dataset water body extent, GNIS 01455473, derived rather than published. No agency publishes a coordinate for this reservoir
Nine places. Utah State Parks publishes no coordinate for anything in this park, so every pin here comes from a dam inventory, a gauge, a water quality station or the Bureau of Land Management.
ItemDetail
Campsites29 total: 3 cottages, 23 standard, 3 standard with full hookups
SeasonOpen year round, no holiday closures
FacilitiesEight shower facilities, 30 amp electric and water at most sites, sewer at full hookup sites, dump station, accessible sites, pets allowed
Hours6 a.m. to 10 p.m. in summer, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. in winter. Quiet hours 10 p.m. to 7 a.m.
Day use15 dollars a private vehicle, 5 dollars for Utah seniors and for walk ins and cyclists, 2 dollars a commercial passenger
Other feesHammock stands 5 dollars a night and tree hammocks prohibited, firewood 6 dollars, ice 3 dollars
On the waterBoat ramp and picnic areas are day use only. Speed limit 15 miles an hour
JumpingAllowed from heights of 15 feet or less, which is the agency rule rather than a guideline
The full hookup sites are listed twice and the lists do not match. The park brochure says sites 18 to 22 . The reservation system says sites 01, 06 and 26 . The campground was completely redesigned and rebuilt in 2022 , which probably explains it, but both are live on state park channels right now. Book off the reservation system, not the brochure.

Camping fees are not published on the park fee page; it refers you to the reservation contractor . Canoe, kayak and paddleboard rentals are offered and their prices are not published either. The park is 1,963 acres .

On 25 March 2022 Utah State Parks announced the park would close for "extensive construction" starting that June and running through the rest of the year, reopening for the 2023 season. The campground was completely redesigned and reconstructed, along with beach access, day use picnic areas and parking .

The same release makes a point of one thing: "Access to the hiking trail leading to the Dinosaur Trackway at Red Fleet State Park will remain open" .

No cost or funding source for the reconstruction was published. And construction disruption was still being reported into 2024. If you are working from a description of this park that predates 2023, it is describing a campground that no longer exists.

In August 2026 the park's own page was flagging the boat ramp as operating at reduced capacity or at risk of closing soon . Check it before towing a boat here.

Steinaker Reservoir is the sister park, and the connection is real but it is not the one people assume. They do not share a watershed. Steinaker is an off stream reservoir fed from Ashley Creek through a feeder canal; Red Fleet is on Big Brush Creek . They are separate tributaries of the Green River with separate entries in the state water quality rules .

What they do share is an operator. Both are Reclamation dams in the Central Utah Project, both are run by the Uintah Water Conservancy District, both are Utah state parks, and Utah State Parks publishes the same phone number, the Steinaker office, as the contact for Red Fleet . Steinaker is the older one, built 1959 to 1962 as the Vernal Unit .

Red FleetSteinaker
Mercury advisoriesNone, despite a mercury fish tissue station hereThree: brown trout, largemouth bass, rainbow trout
Utah record fishNone in any of the five tablesOne, a bluegill taken by spearfishing in 2009
Central Utah Project unitJensen Vernal
Fathom does not have a page on Steinaker yet. When it does, it will be linked here.

The park is open all year and the winter hours are short: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. . Utah State Parks publishes a live ice conditions field for this reservoir, which on 13 August 2026 read open water .

There is no Red Fleet specific ice guidance from any agency. The statewide guidance is the state's outdoor recreation division: at least four inches of good clear ice to walk on, six or more for a snowmobile or an all terrain vehicle, clear ice holds more than cloudy, March and April are particularly dangerous as the ice deteriorates, and "ice is never 100 percent safe" .

The spring inflow is the specific hazard here. The same guidance says to avoid areas near stream mouths and underwater springs , and the creek feeding this reservoir is spring fed out of a karst system . That is not a generic warning at Red Fleet, it is the local one.

The snow card in the strip above is Kings Cabin at 8,740 feet, about ten miles north . It is the closest station to the headwaters of the creek and it is more than 3,000 feet above the reservoir. In summer it reads zero, and that is correct rather than broken.

Fishing  ·  04

Everything in here was killed in 2015, for fish that live somewhere else

Two illegal introductions, one rotenone treatment carried out for endangered fish below the dam, and a rebuilt fishery that most descriptions of this reservoir have not caught up with.

Walleye

Illegally introduced in 2002. It is the reason everything in this reservoir was killed in October 2015, and the concern was never the reservoir. It was the endangered Colorado River fish below the dam. What is stocked now is sterile.

Illegally introduced 2002, poisoned out 2015

Flannelmouth sucker

The only native on this list, and the only fish here before 2015 that was supposed to be. Its relatives downstream are why the treatment happened at all.

The only native in the list

Colorado River cutthroat trout

Native to this drainage and stocked back in after the treatment. The division called it cutthroat trout in its restocking; the habitat project names it in full.

Stocked back after the treatment

Tiger trout

A named target species of the 2017 in lake habitat project, along with crappie, perch, whitefish, cutthroat, walleye and wiper.

Named target of the 2017 habitat project

Wiper

Stocked after the treatment as a predator. A sterile hybrid, which is the point.

Sterile predator, stocked after 2015

Yellow perch

Restocked first and fastest. The division wanted them in before the spring so they could spawn that year.

Restocked November 2015, to spawn that spring

Black crappie

Part of the deliberate rebuild, and one of the seven species the habitat structures were sunk for.

Restocked after the treatment

Largemouth bass

Present before 2015 as an illegal introduction, killed with everything else, and then put back on purpose. Same fish, opposite legal status, ten years apart.

Illegal before 2015, stocked after

Rainbow trout

The original stocking here from 1980, at 78 to 185 fish an acre a year, and still stocked after the treatment.

Stocked here since 1980

Reclamation's environmental assessment sets out the reason in one line: illegally introduced sport fish in Red Fleet threatened endangered Colorado River fishes downstream, through predation or competition . The treatment was not carried out to improve the fishing. It was carried out on behalf of fish that do not live here.

FishHow it got here
WalleyeIllegally introduced in 2002
Smallmouth bassIllegally introduced in the 1980s
Largemouth bass, bluegillAlso present from illegal introductions
Rainbow trout, brown trout, green sunfishStocked or established
Flannelmouth suckerNative

All of it, from the 2015 assessment . The treatment was planned for 13 October 2015, with the wildlife division and the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program as cooperating agencies .

Almost everything written about this reservoir describes fish that were deliberately killed. Red Fleet is still widely called a bluegill and largemouth water. That is the pre 2015 assemblage, most of which was illegal, and bluegill appears in no agency stocking or management list found after the treatment. If a fishing description of Red Fleet does not mention October 2015, it is out of date by more than a decade.

Restocking began in November 2015 . The clearest agency list of what this fishery is now supposed to be comes from a habitat project rather than a stocking record: Watershed Restoration Initiative project 3700, 2017, names its target species as black crappie, yellow perch, mountain whitefish, Colorado River cutthroat trout, tiger trout, walleye and wiper .

That project sank 110 Pond King structures in October 2016, in two groups of 55 about fifty yards apart, for 20,100 dollars of which 15,000 was state money and 5,100 was in kind . Partners: the wildlife division, Utah State Parks, Reclamation, the Red Fleet Management Committee and local angler groups. The project describes the reservoir as "a canyon type lake near Vernal with mixed rocky and muddy terrain" .

The walleye that is here now is sterile. That is the whole point. The recovery program's account of the work says the division removed all fertile walleye in 2015 and then stocked sterile walleye, wipers, largemouth bass, yellow perch, black crappie, trout and fathead minnow, and that the program funded and built screening infrastructure at the reservoir . That is the only place the screening is described, and it is not an agency page.

The original stocking, from 1980, was rainbow trout fingerlings, raised to five inch fish in 1987, at rates between 78 and 185 trout an acre a year . No wildlife division management plan or trend netting report specific to Red Fleet could be found, in a report series that carries them for Rockport, Piute and Hyrum.

Red Fleet has no entry in the rules for specific waters. Checked against its alphabetical neighbours in the 2026 guidebook: the nearest preceding entry is Recapture Reservoir and no Uintah County R entry follows . So the statewide limits are the limits.

  • Trout, kokanee salmon and Arctic grayling, combined: 4
  • Largemouth and smallmouth bass, combined: 6
  • Bluegill and green sunfish, combined: 50
  • Season 1 January through 31 December, and fish may be taken by angling or setline 24 hours a day
The one Red Fleet rule in the whole guidebook is a spearfishing rule, and it is routinely misread. Page 20, verbatim: the listed waters "are closed to the possession of largemouth and smallmouth bass from April 1 through June 27, 2026 (the fourth Saturday in June) while underwater spearfishing" . Red Fleet is on that list, and so is Steinaker. It applies only to spearfishing. Ordinary angling for bass is not restricted in that window.

The guidebook also states that "any person who illegally stocks fish in Utah waters may be criminally prosecuted" . At this reservoir that sentence has a price attached to it, and the price was every fish in the water in October 2015.

Read row by row across all five wildlife division record tables, no row names Red Fleet Reservoir . Steinaker, six miles away, has one: a bluegill, 14 ounces and 9 and three quarter inches, taken by Tony Arbaney in 2009 by spearfishing .

Blue Ribbon status could not be determined either way. The division's Blue Ribbon page publishes the four criteria and no list, and directs users to an interactive map application. No agency list confirming or denying Red Fleet could be found, so this page claims nothing.

The one dated agency fishing observation this page could find: 10 May 2019, fair fishing from shore and boat, wiper and walleye becoming more active, largemouth bass being caught and anglers encouraged to release them to support population growth, and tiger trout to 18 inches near the main ramp .

Recreation  ·  05

What to watch for

One documented drowning, a high hazard dam with no condition rating, and a long list of things nobody measures.

On 15 July 2020 Dustin Peterson, 34, of Uintah County, was boating in the wakeless area when a child in his group began struggling in the water. He went in after the child, got the child back into the boat, and then "was unable to remain afloat and keep his head above water" .

Six agencies worked the incident: Utah State Parks law enforcement, the Division of Wildlife Resources, the Uintah County Sheriff's Office and Search and Rescue, the state parks remote vehicle team, the Department of Public Safety dive team and the Uintah County dive team . At about 10 p.m. the state dive team located him at approximately 40 feet. The remote vehicle team held the position until the county dive team made the recovery .

Neither of them was wearing a life jacket. That is the agency's own sentence and it is the only actionable thing on this page. Utah State Parks also warns that at this reservoir "water may be extremely deep just off shore" , which is what a drowned canyon is.

This is the only drowning, boating fatality or search and rescue incident at Red Fleet that could be sourced from any agency. The county sheriff publishes no accessible incident or search and rescue log. The absence of other records is not evidence that there are none.

  • Jumping and diving are allowed from 15 feet or less. That is an agency rule, not advice . No agency has published a jumping injury or fatality record for Red Fleet.
  • Speed limit 15 miles an hour, and the boat ramp is day use only .
  • Quagga mussels are not here. The wildlife division, updated 21 April 2026: Utah's infested waters are limited to Lake Powell . The statewide rule still applies to you: remove all drain plugs when leaving any water, and decontaminate before entering another.
  • No wind station. The nearest surface observation is Vernal Regional Airport, about ten miles southwest and more than 400 feet lower. This is a canyon reservoir with sandstone fins standing in it, and an airport wind is a poor proxy for what is happening on the water.
  • No maximum depth, no mean depth, no shoreline length and no bathymetric survey from any agency, including the federal report written about this reservoir .
  • No agency record of a 2018 dive to recover the thrown track slabs, and no record of the 2001 one either outside a single newspaper story .
  • No ichnogenus, no trackmaker and no peer reviewed description of the tracksite.
  • No current water quality assessment, no algae advisory history, no cell counts and no toxin concentrations. The state environmental department's site is closed to automated reading in full.
  • No condition rating for a high hazard dam. The national inventory records the hazard potential as high and the condition assessment as not available . Red Fleet is not state regulated, because Reclamation owns it, so there is no Utah dam safety record either.
  • No prosecution, citation or sentence from the 2018 damage. The only legal consequence ever recorded at this trackway is the juvenile charges in 2001, and that is in the newspaper account .
  • No agency statement about track damage after 30 April 2018. Nobody publishes condition monitoring, so silence is not the same as it having stopped.
A new law took effect on 6 May 2026 and it may or may not cover these tracks. House Bill 536 makes damaging or defacing public land features a crime, with penalties rising to a third degree felony, and it creates a restoration fund . Its protected categories are geological and archaeological. Paleontological features and fossils are not named in the enrolled text . Whether a track bearing sandstone slab counts as a "unique rock formation or feature" under it has not been tested or clarified by any agency, so this page does not claim that it does. The statute that certainly applies is the older one: unpermitted excavation of a critical paleontological resource is a class B misdemeanor .

The Utah Geological Survey has been writing about this for a decade. Its own 2016 explainer on geovandalism, which it defines as the ruin of valuable earth features by wanton or malicious conduct, names this place directly: "the theft and mutilation of dinosaur prints and trackways around the Colorado Plateau and at Red Fleet State Park." The same article records a bill called Protection of State Park Resources, which would have increased the punishment for defacing geological features in a state park, and notes that it did not pass . Ten years later a broader one did.

Somebody threw a 200 million year old footprint into this reservoir and no agency knows whether it is still down there.

Fathom Restoration is a Utah 501(c)(3) that runs volunteer dive cleanups and is built to pull what does not belong out of Utah water, statewide.

Donate to Protect Red Fleet

Every figure on this page is quoted from the source named beside it.

FATHOM RESTORATION
This page is narrower than most writing about Red Fleet in three places. No agency record was found of any dive to recover the dinosaur track slabs thrown into the water in 2018; every account describes a dive as considered rather than done. The 2001 recovery, in which two volunteer divers got back about 90 percent of the damaged footprints, is documented in one newspaper article and nowhere else. And no agency names a trackmaker or a formal track name for this site, so this page does not either. The outline above was traced for a print and checked against the federal water body polygon; it is 8.8 percent apart on proportion, and the reservoir itself has ranged from about 149 to about 524 acres, so no single outline is the right one. Nobody publishes a depth for this water. This is a reference for the public and is not a navigation chart.